Valve lash solid lifter 289

289 - 351 cid Small Block Performance
Post Reply
User avatar
Joe Travers
Posts: 2436
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana

Valve lash solid lifter 289

Post by Joe Travers »

Hey folks!
Looking for some experienced opinions on the mystery cam. Can't find the original builder to get make or specs.
Engine runs well, so I don't want to tear into it, just routine maintenance here.

I'm familiar with the old HP cam with long duration and 0.02" lash spec.
I'm pretty sure this is a modern grind with less duration. I'm seeing tighter lash specs for those.
Have it idling @ 800. It's bouncing 50 rpm, more or less.

I'm not racing, wondering if the old spec is the safest bet?
Rather lose a little lift than burn a valve.

Thanks!

JT
Image

1963 1/2 Custom Hardtop
342 stroker, solid roller, T-10, 3.55 posi

robib
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:32 pm

Re: Valve lash solid lifter 289

Post by robib »

A happy valve is a loose valve. Have a Comp Cams solid lifter cam in my 63 289/302, which is close to the Ford 271 cam. The valve lash is .022 intake and exhaust. Don't see how you could go wrong with that setting.

User avatar
Joe Travers
Posts: 2436
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana

Re: Valve lash solid lifter 289

Post by Joe Travers »

robib wrote:
Mon Oct 05, 2020 7:09 pm
A happy valve is a loose valve. Have a Comp Cams solid lifter cam in my 63 289/302, which is close to the Ford 271 cam. The valve lash is .022 intake and exhaust. Don't see how you could go wrong with that setting.
Thanks for the recommendation!
I finally found a general recommendation of 0.020 (hot) for iron heads, 0.015 for aluminum heads.
I agree, rather loose than burnt.

JT
Image

1963 1/2 Custom Hardtop
342 stroker, solid roller, T-10, 3.55 posi

Post Reply