1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

The Era of The Square Body Racing Comets
Post Reply
iglooman
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu May 25, 2023 1:52 pm

1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by iglooman »

For a 289 in a 65 which configuration are the rad hoses suppose to be?

Both on passenger side?

gary

User avatar
Joe Travers
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by Joe Travers »

Yep.
302 is driver side on the bottom. You can use 289 water pump on 302 if you use 289 rad.
Either way, water pump and rad need to match.

Joe
Image

1963 1/2 Custom Hardtop
342 stroker, solid roller, T-10, 3.55 posi

iglooman
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu May 25, 2023 1:52 pm

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by iglooman »

Joe Travers wrote:
Sun Jun 11, 2023 9:43 am
Yep.
302 is driver side on the bottom. You can use 289 water pump on 302 if you use 289 rad.
Either way, water pump and rad need to match.

Joe

Awesome....thanks

User avatar
Jims65cyclone
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:29 pm
Location: Lexington, SC

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by Jims65cyclone »

Joe Travers wrote:
Sun Jun 11, 2023 9:43 am
302 is driver side on the bottom. You can use 289 water pump on 302 if you use 289 rad.
Interesting. :? PO told me my car has a 302 out of a 69 Fairlane 500 in it, but the lower hose is on the passenger side of pump. Seems that would either mean:
a. I actually still have a 289 in my car and the PO either didn't know the true history, or purposely mislead me for some reason, OR
b. The 302 water pump was changed out with one for a 289 at some point.

Guess I'll find out the truth when I tear down the engine and can check some numbers.

Jim
Image

comethead
Posts: 5692
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:44 pm
Location: Palmdale, CA

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by comethead »

Hey Jim the NPD website lists a RH inlet 65-69 cast iron water pump p/n #8501-2A https://www.npdlink.com/1965-1973-musta ... pump/pumps
If you click on the “View All Applications” button you’ll see a note that says “Some late 69s may have a LH inlet”. So there was a change there in late 69. I’ll take a look at my SBF book tomorrow to get some details on this.
Pump #8501-7A is the 69-73 LH inlet pump.

Joe
1965 Caliente HT- 289/4 speed
1964 Falcon HT- track car- 302/4 speed
Image

Lou's Comet
Posts: 1544
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:56 pm
Location: Jeannette, Pa.

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by Lou's Comet »

Jims65cyclone wrote:
Sun Jun 11, 2023 11:30 pm
Interesting. :? PO told me my car has a 302 out of a 69 Fairlane 500 in it, but the lower hose is on the passenger side of pump. Seems that would either mean:
a. I actually still have a 289 in my car and the PO either didn't know the true history, or purposely mislead me for some reason, OR
b. The 302 water pump was changed out with one for a 289 at some point.

Guess I'll find out the truth when I tear down the engine and can check some numbers.

Jim
Jim,

Joe (comethead) is correct. In 1970 (and some late 69's) they changed hose from pass side to drivers side on the 302 water pump. They also went from a 3 bolt crank pulley to a 4 bolt crank pulley, the timing marks went from drivers side to pass side, different rad, and think brackets and water pump pulley were changed.

So your engine could easily be a 69 302 with pass side rad hose. It would also have 3 bolt crank pulley.

Lou

User avatar
Joe Travers
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by Joe Travers »

Jims65cyclone wrote:
Sun Jun 11, 2023 11:30 pm
Interesting. :? PO told me my car has a 302 out of a 69 Fairlane 500 in it, but the lower hose is on the passenger side of pump. Seems that would either mean:
a. I actually still have a 289 in my car and the PO either didn't know the true history, or purposely mislead me for some reason, OR
b. The 302 water pump was changed out with one for a 289 at some point.

Guess I'll find out the truth when I tear down the engine and can check some numbers.

Jim
Was referring to igloo's 302 engine (if he were to install it).
I had a '70 302 in my Cyclone and changed the water pump to passenger side to eliminate rusting steel crossover mess formed from two hoses :?

Joe
Image

1963 1/2 Custom Hardtop
342 stroker, solid roller, T-10, 3.55 posi

User avatar
Jims65cyclone
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:29 pm
Location: Lexington, SC

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by Jims65cyclone »

Thanks, guys. Sounds like I probably have an early '69 302. The water inlet is on the passenger's side, and my timing mark is on the driver's side. the car is parked nose-in against the garage wall at the moment, so I can't get to the engine compartment without moving it, but when I do, I'll check the crank pully for a bolt count. If it has 3, that should pretty well cinch it being an early '69 302.

Jim
Image

User avatar
poboyjo65
Moderator
Posts: 7070
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:40 pm
Location: Camden, Tenn.

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by poboyjo65 »

Jims65cyclone wrote:
Mon Jun 12, 2023 5:15 pm
Thanks, guys. Sounds like I probably have an early '69 302. The water inlet is on the passenger's side, and my timing mark is on the driver's side. the car is parked nose-in against the garage wall at the moment, so I can't get to the engine compartment without moving it, but when I do, I'll check the crank pully for a bolt count. If it has 3, that should pretty well cinch it being an early '69 302.

Jim
Jim look at the little pad in front of the driverside head for an engine build date code. if the block has not been decked it should still be there & easy to see;

Image
Image
Image
Johno

User avatar
Jims65cyclone
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:29 pm
Location: Lexington, SC

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by Jims65cyclone »

What does yours decode as?

Jim
Image

User avatar
poboyjo65
Moderator
Posts: 7070
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:40 pm
Location: Camden, Tenn.

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by poboyjo65 »

Jims65cyclone wrote:
Mon Jun 12, 2023 11:49 pm
What does yours decode as?

Jim

Jim I think dec 26 1964 afaik.

Image
Image
Johno

User avatar
Joe Travers
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana

Re: 1965 v8 rad hose configuration?

Post by Joe Travers »

Jims65cyclone wrote:
Mon Jun 12, 2023 5:15 pm
Thanks, guys. Sounds like I probably have an early '69 302. The water inlet is on the passenger's side, and my timing mark is on the driver's side. the car is parked nose-in against the garage wall at the moment, so I can't get to the engine compartment without moving it, but when I do, I'll check the crank pully for a bolt count. If it has 3, that should pretty well cinch it being an early '69 302.
Cross reference the casting number from the block pan rail behind the starter to the date stamp John showed you to find the day and year. You don't have to pull the starter. You can use a mirror and a penlight to read it.

When I bought my '63, the guy insisted it had a 289. When I got it on the lift to inspect it, found it had heavy 4 bolt damper on the crank and figured it was 302 w/ the 289 water pump conversion. All original sheetmetal under the car with no rust. Ran the codes on door plate and verified it was a factory 4 speed car. Magnet test on rockers and panels, passed. Handed over the check.

Two years ago, found a guy w/ a ton of Ford stuff including many project cars. He had about a dozen engines sitting on stands in his shop for sale. He was particularly proud of one FE that had a tag that read '428 CJ'. He pointed to factory sticker on valve cover, read 428. Had Autolite 4300 on it and two bolts on exhaust flanges on the heads. :?

Joe
Image

1963 1/2 Custom Hardtop
342 stroker, solid roller, T-10, 3.55 posi

Post Reply