Build thread: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

The Era of The Square Body Racing Comets
ec164
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 11:55 am
Location: essexville. MI

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by ec164 »

The Deck is only .300 taller than a Cleveland, won't be much wider than stock 351C. Those Pretty Boss 302/351 style tappet covers gives a illusion of big. The photos from above show you have decent room in there. Andy could show us the 9.2 deck version in a 65' Comet, I know he has pictures...............Al
Your ahead in a Mercury....all the way!

User avatar
SASSY
Moderator
Posts: 5134
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:32 am
Location: Wynndel, BC CANADA

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by SASSY »

65clevorcyclone wrote:Its actually a windsor block, so its taller deck height makes it wider. Ill have to measure the width of it when its out next.
man I feel bad! It didn't even click the upper rad hose isn't coming up off the block :oops: :oops:
I'd rather do it myself if it's done right or not,,,isn't that what hotrodding is all about

Image

CALIFORNIA CALIENTE
Posts: 5933
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:57 am
Location: Camarillo,California

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by CALIFORNIA CALIENTE »

Al.my Windsor it TALL and WIDE,could not even use my FE MERCURY Pentroof VCs,even without the adapters,NO ROOM!!!It is also why I went to the BOSS 429 Scoop,the carb was almost touching the hood!!! ROY.
Real Racecars have 3 pedals
Image

65clevorcyclone
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:54 am
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by 65clevorcyclone »

ec164 wrote:The Deck is only .300 taller than a Cleveland, won't be much wider than stock 351C. Those Pretty Boss 302/351 style tappet covers gives a illusion of big. The photos from above show you have decent room in there. Andy could show us the 9.2 deck version in a 65' Comet, I know he has pictures...............Al
Its pretty wide, once you get the large cleveland heads on it, compared to a windsor head, it takes up a lot of real estate quickly. I had the engine in there with the stock shock towers, an there probably wasnt 1/8" of room between the vertical reinforcements that are welded on between the upper control arm bolts. I bet its very close to the width of an fe engine

caseville cyclone
Posts: 503
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 12:10 pm
Location: Caseville, Michigan

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by caseville cyclone »

65Clevorcyclone, I'll try to post some pictures of my 351 Cleveland bolted in my 65 Comet Cyclone. I have a Crites shock tower kit and Charles Crites said the engine with his kit sets 2 inches lower in the engine bay. I have Ford Motorsports tall valve covers to clear my roller rocker arms. It really fills the engine bay but I still have some room in there. Look in the 64-65 comet section of this site under Caseville Cyclone about three or four pages in and I think I some pictures of me setting the motor in. Andy (In the meantime I'll try to post some pictures of the final installation)
Image

Travis65Comet
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:43 pm

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by Travis65Comet »

Oh it looks so good. Still plunking at my 351c 65 build. I will get there one day.

b.guggenmos
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 7:19 pm
Location: Olympia, Washington

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by b.guggenmos »

Travis65Comet wrote:Oh it looks so good. Still plunking at my 351c 65 build. I will get there one day.
Me too Travis. I just sent you a PM. Brian
1965 Comet Cyclone Drag Car Aquamarine, 351C, 4 speed, 5:14, ladder bars, 10.50@129mph
1965 Falcon Tube Chassis Drag Car, 347, Jerico, 4 Link 9.?
1970 Boss 302 Yellow, Deluxe Interior, Shaker, Slats, 4:30 Drag Pac
1932 Ford 5 Window Coupe

Travis65Comet
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:43 pm

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by Travis65Comet »

What front suspension are you planning on using?

65clevorcyclone
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:54 am
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by 65clevorcyclone »

Got a couple more things mocked up. Steering column, shaft, crossmember and rack & pinion.

Image

65clevorcyclone
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:54 am
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by 65clevorcyclone »

Image

65clevorcyclone
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:54 am
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by 65clevorcyclone »

Image

65clevorcyclone
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:54 am
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by 65clevorcyclone »

Image

65clevorcyclone
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:54 am
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by 65clevorcyclone »

I know the angle on the top u joint is tight, but it cycles freely with no binding. It has a little bit more adjustment that I can do to lessen the angle.

User avatar
SASSY
Moderator
Posts: 5134
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:32 am
Location: Wynndel, BC CANADA

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by SASSY »

Ya the joint angle sure looks sharp in the pic.
Is lowering the front of the column an option?
Boy it's pretty clean in there!!
Fred
I'd rather do it myself if it's done right or not,,,isn't that what hotrodding is all about

Image

65clevorcyclone
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:54 am
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Pics of the 65 Cyclone.

Post by 65clevorcyclone »

SASSY wrote:Ya the joint angle sure looks sharp in the pic.
Is lowering the front of the column an option?
Boy it's pretty clean in there!!
Fred
No, lowering it won't do anything, the column stick out needs to be less, which will decrease the angle. Keep in mind that this is all a complete flaming river system, I haven't modified or built this from other companies.

Post Reply